Implicit surface a.k.a (signed) distance field: definition

Render by Elmar Glaubauf (

In computer graphics, when people hear "implicit surface" most of them think about metaballs, blobby objects and the marching cube. I want to define here implicit surface as a much more general concept and basic jargon related to this field.

\( \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{ \mathbf{#1} }  \)


Let's be clear from the start, implicit surfaces are not just metaballs! Nowdays you can model virtually anything with implicit surfaces, from simple shapes like cubes, cylinders etc. to very intricate shapes such as human characters or creatures. Implicit surfaces can represent sharp edges and are not just limited to soft shapes. Some nice rendering of implicit surfaces also known as (signed) distance fields:

Considering only metaballs and the marching cube for implicit surfaces would be the equivalent of thinking only about clothes and rasterization when talking about meshes. With both you can model a variety of 3D models and both can be rendered in various ways (raytracing etc.). Another common mistake is to think of implicit surfaces a.k.a (signed) distance fields only as mathematical equations. This is wrong, for instance voxel grids can be used to store implicit surfaces.

Other popular games based on or using implicit surfaces:

What they are not

Before defining what is an implicit surface I always like to define it's counterpart first: explicit surfaces. An explicit surface can be triangular mesh, a parametric surface (e.g. splines, nurbs, ...) and so on, anything that explicitly represent a surface. For instance, take a look a the parametric function \( s : \mathbb R^2 \rightarrow \mathbb R^3\) this function takes in input 2 parameters \((u,v)\) and returns a point \((x,y,z)\) directly on the surface. We can explicitly and directly extract points on the surface.

From the slides of

On the other hand the volume is implicit, even if the parametric surface or mesh represent a closed object, determining if a point in space \( \vec p \) is inside or outside the object will be more tricky.

What they really are

It's not a surface it's a volume!

Implicit surfaces are actually explicit volumes they explicitly define what is the inside and outside of your object. Let's define it formally. Consider the function \( f:\mathbb R^3 \rightarrow \mathbb R \) this function takes a 3D point \( (x,y,z) \) in input and returns a single value. This value tells us explicitly if we are outside or inside the volume:

f(x,y,z) > 0 & \color{red} \text{ are points outside the object }\\
f(x,y,z) < 0 & \color{blue} \text{ are points inside the object }\\

On the other hand, the surface is defined implicitly, there is no way to compute directly from \(f\) points on the surface or it will need some extra efforts. An implicit surface is then defined as follow:

$$ f(x,y,z) = 0 \color{grey} \text{  are points on the surface} $$

Let's define an implicit surface with the equation of a sphere whose center is \(\vec c \in \mathbb R^3\) and radius \( r \):

f( \vec p ) & = &  \| \vec p - \vec c \| - r  &  \\
f(x,y,z) & = & \sqrt{(x-c_x)^2 + (y-c_y)^2 + (z-c_z)^2 } - r& \\

For points \( \vec p \) at a distance \( r \) from the center \(\vec c\) of the sphere \(f(\vec p) = 0\):


What \(f(\vec p) = 0\) defines is the \( 0\text{-isosurface} \). We can actually define an infinity of implicit surfaces from the sphere's equation. Consider \( f(\vec p) = iso\) then for \(iso = -2.3\) you have the \( -2.3\text{-isosurface} \), for \(iso = 0.1\) the \( 0.1\text{-isosurface} \) and so on.


The function \( f \), which now we know defines a volume, is also sometimes called scalar-field. It associates to every 3D points in space (the field) a single real value (a scalar). For instance imagine \( f \) indicates the temperature of a room at any point in space:

You could possibly extract the iso-surface for points at a 20C° temperature and see what area of the room is below 20C°. Sometimes instead of the word 'scalar' the term 'potential' is used, and \( f \) then describes a 'potential-field' but this is only a matter of taste.

Distance field

Yet another way to look at this function \(f : \mathbb R^3 \rightarrow \mathbb R\) is to interpret it as a distance field. For instance \( f( \vec p) = \| \vec p - \vec c \| - r \) actually returns the signed distance from the point \( \vec p \) to the surface of the sphere of radius \( r \).


You can use a 3D grids (3D textures, voxels etc.) to store values of \( f \) (a sample). When sampling the function \( f \) on a regularly spaced grid: \( f(0,0,0) \), \( f(0.1,0,0) \), \( f(0.2,0,0) \) etc. you can then get the intermediate values (e.g. \(f(0.15,0,0)\)) with tri-linear interpolation.

A more concrete example are MRI where you get a stack of textures describing the density of the body and from which you could extract the surface of the organs.


An implicit surface is defined by the equation \(f(\vec p) = iso\) with \(f\) actually defining a volume and is known under many names: scalar / potential / (signed) distance / density field. \(f\) can be defined with mathematical equations (sphere, cylinder, ellipse...) but the same way we have triangle meshes to represent a surface we can store the volume of \( f \) into a 3D grid.

In future posts we'll see that contrary to explicit surface representations such as meshes, implicit surfaces are extremely easy and robust when it comes to combine and blend them together. This is usually called Constructive Solide Geometry or boolean modeling:

Lastly it is extremely useful for collision detection since you only have to check the sign of \(f\) to determine if you are inside or outside the considered object.

The main difficulty resides into rendering implicit surfaces, and can be computationally costly. Mainly two methods exists, conversion to a triangle mesh with the marching cube algorithm or ray marching.

No comments

All html tags except <b> and <i> will be removed from your comment. You can make links by just typing the url or mail-address.
Spam bot question: